Scientific concepts are, by definition, a great logical structure part of them have very accentuated the relational nature, i.e. that the core or sense of the concept determines what are their relevant attributes.; However, is proved that most of people has a conception erroneous or diverging from many scientific phenomena and that this conception is set, in part to the demands of the probabilistic theories, perhaps therefore it can be argued that well-defined scientific concepts they do not represent the way in which people tend to conceptualize the world. And perhaps for that reason not getting satisfactory answers in discussions and so generically spoke from experience, thinking in relation to feeling, or being or not be. There I found my gap went back to reread my notes of cognition and emotion in the two basic emotions of the individual (approach / flight) are not ruled from these theories where daily life is quite scorned or defined as badly defined because the role of the emotions is ignoring (more archaic cognitive process in human evolution and which has made possible the survival of the species) when searchingexplore and act on solving problems, or perhaps you do incur the most typical mistakes of deductive thinking, formal logic, the probabilistic or any other strategy to solve problems. I still think that the interpretation and the endowment of meaning is which makes possible hypothesis and a relationship between the previous knowledge and experience that enables us to arrive at possible solutions or as says the module the most successful. Although these can, by very scientific that its checks have been reaching conclusions scientific that the Earth was flat and then round. The mastery of the content I think that it has been satisfactory since the understanding of different models both explanatory and prescriptive and normative, as we form concepts and problems of the various theories and how according to the classification are not able to give an explanation of how we form concepts.